Press enter to see results or esc to cancel.

Private Labeling of News Readers

On Portals and KM: The Need for Feed(s) – Wired I have learned that the together with decided to partner on delivering a Denver Post-branded newsreader to their readers with specific capabilities that will enable every day news readers (And not only RSS technology early adopters) to enjoy the new newsreading experience. Although the situation where a mainstream publisher enters into this kind of commitment is a big step for the industry I am not sure it is the right long term for NewsGator or any other standalone aggregator company in their real landscape

The immediate and tempting effect of this type of s (Assuming it is executed flawlessly) is high volume of exposure given to the company thanks to the active promotion done by the publisher, an exposure that is very appealing to a that tries very hard to build a mass base. Still, I think this kind of strategy will divert the focus of aggregator companies from their main battle field, the dominance on the news reading experience for s.

If we try to define the aggregators competitive landscape then there are the s at the form of startup companies that develop and evolve the news reading experience and on the other side there are the established players that already have a strong customer base of some type (Usually a customer base that can be leveraged for deploying a new type of application) that are starting to provide their own news reading capabilities.

The news reading experience based on the new mechanisms enabled by RSS/Blogging technologies is being re-shaped everyday thanks to the feedback provided by s (Usually the only type of users who tell you what they think on what you do) and its futuristic shape will depend highly on new type of information sources and new s that will in the future. RSS as a is emerging and evolving and the experience evolvement is "tied" to the advancement of this medium. Unlike established companies, startups only chance to win a considerable market share depends on innovation and careful care of the early adopters needs; accomplishing that requires a strong focus on their innovative .

A startup company that supports several versions (If their current plans go right, of course) that are delivered directly to will branch the aggregator's company efforts into several different streams of requirements (Depends on the number of partners and their level bureaucracy) that will not necessarily help them stay at the frontline of . On the same time that the aggregator startup will collect a customer base, large or small, the established players will be able to keep up with the innovation and then deploy it towards their customer base, which is most of the time considerably larger then the accumulated customer base of the startup (Needless to talk about their promotional capabilities). This situation within time will erode the startups achievements and will make their customer base turn into the best product in the market – the established player's product.

I think that news readers have just started to emerge and being innovative is one of the only competitive weapons a startup can build in the fight against established players.